From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Babel CALL no longer produces HTML output Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:01:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87shuyw3hg.fsf@saiph.selenimh> References: <87r3akzh3c.fsf@iki.fi> <87fur0fgbh.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <87wpkaw5ym.fsf@saiph.selenimh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRapU-0005ev-Ey for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:01:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRapS-0006YC-Km for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:01:35 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:53728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRapS-0006Xz-Ek for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:01:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Thomas S. Dye's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2016 21:48:32 -1000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: Jarmo Hurri , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, "Charles C. Berry" Hello, "Thomas S. Dye" writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> You may want to add (:eval . "yes") to >> `org-babel-default-lob-header-args' if you disagree. > > Perhaps this should be added to the default value of > org-babel-default-lob-header-args for the sake of legacy code? I don't think so, for three reasons: 1. `org-babel-default-lob-header-args' didn't include this association previously; 2. unlike to :exports, there is no obvious default value for the :eval argument; the expected default value would be to unset :eval, which requires another mechanism; 3. I think it is dangerous to assume and Babel call can be evaled, even if the original source block cannot; after all, the user explicitly marked the original code block with ":eval no" for a reason. WDYT? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou