From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thomas S. Dye" Subject: Re: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. " References: <87lgd671k7.fsf@bzg.fr> <87o9i2p9qq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k1sq6znz.fsf@bzg.fr> <871seyp6fr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874lju6tap.fsf@bzg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCqJw-00048h-F3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:41:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCqJt-0006kL-Cy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:41:08 -0400 Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.33.93]:36562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCqJt-0006e5-75 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:41:05 -0400 Received: from cmgw14.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.14]) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFD01AB556 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 11:41:00 -0600 (MDT) In-reply-to: <874lju6tap.fsf@bzg.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou Bastien writes: > I wish I'd be as optimistic as you are and assume every user > reads > ORG-NEWS! I seriously doubt a majority of users do. Those > installing > Org from ELPA cannot possibly know where to find ORG-NEWS, Org > gives > no indication where it lives: IOW, it's not even because users > are > lazy or what. Would it be difficult to add an ORG-NEWS option to the Documentation section of the Org drop-down menu? It's an interesting document. Re: org tempo. I really appreciate all the work done to preserve backward compatibility with the expansion mechanism. I use Org for almost all my work nowadays and I hate to put my other work on hold to re-implement some Org mode functionality that I rely on. That said, I didn't find the addition of (require org-tempo) to my configuration onerous. I admire the kind of thinking that simplifies in order to make complexity possible. Keep it up! All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com