From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: noweb Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:17:21 -0500 Message-ID: <87sgk6htj2.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> References: <87sgk7qnxb.fsf@nulle1.home> <877e1jqb2w.fsf@nulle1.home> <878sly4pyz.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58771) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuhyr-0005Vg-PP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:17:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuhyq-0007bg-LL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:17:29 -0500 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([159.69.161.202]:45180) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuhyq-0007ZX-Ev for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:17:28 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iuhyn-0001Tm-J3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 20:17:25 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Fraga, Eric" writes: > My approach to this is to create three blocks that are tangled and a > separate block (or more than one if you have different tests you want to > perform) for evaluation that references those three blocks (via noweb) > but is not tangled. That works, but shouldn't Nuno's approach with :noweb eval work? What use is it to include unexpanded noweb markers in the tangled output? -- Nick "There are only two hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors." -Martin Fowler