From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Bug: org-refile-get-target offers default candidate in duplicity
 [9.2.6 (9.2.6-4-ge30905-elpaplus @
 /home/gustavo/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20191007/)]
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 01:38:26 +0100
Message-ID: <87sgjaavzx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87lftw1k2n.fsf@gmail.com> <875zgb7520.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87sgjfgsoy.fsf@gmail.com> <87a75nexqy.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJcAo8t3RcZo42x1+v9XdkphS=fr+cJgBz7tthOGOF=HTWw3WA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87blq1trjo.fsf@bzg.fr>
 <CAJcAo8t_cuEm-YtvuZ5LznTuJdakgSUcrGjebL6FumaGErCRuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87d0aegjee.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJcAo8teibWVzadRrQgBQdNfuppV75Lzu_Hq5+OOOpFGJuOm-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJcAo8u0amuWwvacX=DjiMTXU4NrVuFfw1aA1vNS8ip1FDvmJw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33046)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1j3UQe-0006P8-VH
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 19:38:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJcAo8u0amuWwvacX=DjiMTXU4NrVuFfw1aA1vNS8ip1FDvmJw@mail.gmail.com>
 (Samuel Wales's message of "Sun, 16 Feb 2020 17:25:25 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Gustavo Barros <gusbrs.2016@gmail.com>

Hi Samuel,

sorry to insist, but what I really need is a *fiable and easy* way to
reproduce a bug.  Other comments (like code analysis) are only useful
when I do have a reproducible bug.

I'm willing to spend as much time as needed on a MCE, but I'm waiting
for this MCE before interpreting comments on code and possible bugs.

Thanks for your understanding,

-- 
 Bastien