From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id mJiRAcsD6l/PPgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 16:11:55 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id oO/SOMoD6l9YOgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 16:11:54 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 514239404CF for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 16:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36954 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktv7h-0004Et-12 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 11:11:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktv7J-0004Ek-9A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 11:11:29 -0500 Received: from libre.brussels ([2a01:4f8:201:1044::1]:44110) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktv7H-0005g8-6B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 11:11:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=libre.brussels; s=mail; t=1609171881; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CzkjuB1kDfxDa/MBe7shuhJ9yPAsJT7kkLsB2ZN7vFg=; b=Lq4/NgRK+a76a7XHO221FLW+1zO/L8/c6ocqEHN1A7mxWZyOXYF5CqKU3Hsjs50OuBcg5D tM3N6mL+3M9tRaNcx+rKpdwVcIJImmE/Meb2Rkbl7yNwybrO/6WbKHG1NtiAz+jNbSabOm +puB+57vIFm9k+pappHnecuxZL9UtXg= References: <87tus6oxsg.fsf@posteo.net> <874kk6ynt1.fsf@mbork.pl> <87o8ieos9c.fsf@posteo.net> From: Jonathan McHugh To: Juan Manuel =?utf-8?Q?Mac=C3=ADas?= Subject: Re: Org to ConTeXt exporter? In-reply-to: <87o8ieos9c.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 17:09:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87sg7pud3e.fsf@libre.brussels> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f8:201:1044::1; envelope-from=indieterminacy@libre.brussels; helo=libre.brussels X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.22 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=libre.brussels header.s=mail header.b=Lq4/NgRK; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=libre.brussels (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 514239404CF X-Spam-Score: -0.22 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: bXVAuLI1AsJ8 Hello \Context folks, I have wondered about the interoperability between Context and Latex. As somebody who (previously) invested a lot of time into Latex, my migratio= n to Context (due to its emphasis on Lua) grew problematic once other commitments grew. The lack of Context support in Org-Mode has made me consider reverting back to Latex. However, I have wondered if a possible shortcut is to compile a list of the semantic differences between the two and attack it from there. For example, the Context stub, 'From Latex to Context', gives some of the distinctions: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/From_LaTeX_to_ConTeXt ... which then cites a 45 page pdf (which may (possibly) be a little out of date, having been written in 2003): http://www.berenddeboer.net/tex/LaTeX2ConTeXt.pdf Perhaps looking at Org-Modes Latex exporter and determining the Context equivalent would help? After all, they should be satisfing equivalent requi= rements. Even better, if a modern list of equivalents were in a locality suitable for non Org-Mode users then it may become easier for users from either communities to feed off eachothers work a little easier. If I had a lot of time it would be wonderful to develop parsing expression grammars to capture it all, irrespective of direction ... mmm ti= me.... Best wishes, Jonathan Juan Manuel Mac=C3=ADas writes: > Hello, Marcin, > > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> Creating an exporter from scratch is probably easier than you think. >> A few years ago I planned a tutorial about this, but another job >> happened, then covid happened etc. Now that I finished some big project >> taking me a lot of time, I might be tempted to revisit that. Would >> there be demand for a DYI Org-exporter-from-scratch tutorial? > > Thank you for your answer. Actually a tutorial on how to create an > exporter from scratch (I think) would be really interesting. Some time > ago I was tempted to start writing an exporter for ConTeXt, studying the > code of the other exporters, but for time and work reasons I left the > project abandoned. > > If you finally write that tutorial, I could also translate it into > Spanish to spread it out among Spanish-speaking Org users. > > Regards, > > Juan Manuel=20 > >> Best, --=20 Jonathan McHugh indieterminacy@libre.brussels