From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id jCaoBuHB8V9nawAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 13:08:49 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id aJzlAeHB8V8mEgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 13:08:49 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3012F9404E8 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2021 13:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47374 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kw37l-000549-RN for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 08:08:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kw36w-00053r-Uw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 08:07:54 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:35533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kw36u-0004Dt-HO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 08:07:54 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6102C2400FD for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2021 14:07:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1609679269; bh=T+3j7ZG5TTGJ8NU3L6fMv5QMf2i4WmrZI43zJIokQ54=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=DS5bGnYLi/ty2m9UQMDoMcQlYGi4PT9JPixovERylkWTCTsnLbDwhnsUyqijbElDc g9PiojiUy0PU5uOdhov7Liuh/sQbgaiqh72ueFlpAD8fEb64UKVzccPt5036CWZeN7 cQDAI+vz17VrxlKhknDwaNn92nL5Fh61ElQM+PH9/cbh3uNMZTGYdXm/k4p4wdLRO6 3Yjz+2Ep8intYBQTsd/1/hcq7YPKOByGbF69nxUWVIEE1ppty8x0n/cDhNYTI9MVA+ avB0LlPLTqqSiCR1Q9ZytRk6N9RLyBRI9Rqg73zi18rUsoskhP48yitBDxZ6jtwZb4 ogi3KLkVIXQYg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4D7zZX25Y4z6tm8; Sun, 3 Jan 2021 14:07:48 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= To: TEC Subject: Re: [PATCH] A proposal to add LaTeX attributes to verse blocks References: <87pn38s5wo.fsf@posteo.net> <87ft3itiu2.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2021 14:07:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ft3itiu2.fsf@gmail.com> (TEC's message of "Sun, 03 Jan 2021 18:25:08 +0800") Message-ID: <87sg7ijhi5.fsf@posteo.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=maciaschain@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: orgmode Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.03 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=DS5bGnYL; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 3012F9404E8 X-Spam-Score: -3.03 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: vJRjr2KKBGCA Hi Timothy, TEC writes: > Hi Juan, > > Thanks for your patch. > > This looks like a fairly sensible addition. Two comments from me: > > 1. I'm not sure that "options" is a good name for arbitrary LaTeX which > is included inside the verse block. Perhaps something like "insert" > or "include", etc. may be a better fit. > 2. It's considered generally nice to document features like this :) The > two documents which I'd think to note this in are ORG-NEWS and the > manual (docs/manual.org). Thank you very much for your response and your comments. I agree to name "Insert, include, etc." the attribute to include arbitrary LaTeX code, better than "options". Of course, I can add the necessary documentation to the files you tell me. As I am new to submitting patches, I don't really know how to proceed: do I have to send you the new version of the patch, with the documentation? Should I send a new email with all of it to this list? Best regards, Juan Manuel > All the best, > > Timothy. >