From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id WOGoHQiSHWA1FQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 18:44:24 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id gMqgGQiSHWA9eAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 18:44:24 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB9D19402B1 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35108 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l865e-0008CS-MX for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 13:44:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l85vY-0000hr-F6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 13:33:56 -0500 Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:40388 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l85vS-00012X-D4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 13:33:56 -0500 Received: from localhost (c-73-254-86-141.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.254.86.141]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 187DEFA165; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:33:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1612550026; bh=p9qli5UGEEoD2k7XBETIPH3LTSMplrO9XMUOFwG/Er4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Sd0crUbCu95TuGkCSfi3uLV/9hb7yV+vsBjdIL9aXqGEx1yvflCc6SmNKQwI3x6LY iH6TFadvvrnuGX11PquagSi/z4X5DUZe4ANt+csSD1MHtYA5LM+SOFqEC1QaW16waR NcQVLxTJ9ZE4bG8Reeffi+fHn1fwkRFuWw45JdP4= From: Eric Abrahamsen To: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Free up C-c SPC/org-table-blank-field? References: <87im7k51u0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <875z39y8ua.fsf@kyleam.com> <871rdv6upl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87im77njpx.fsf@gmail.com> <8735ya7sxd.fsf@christianmoe.com> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 10:33:44 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:44:17 +0100") Message-ID: <87sg6a2wl3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=52.70.2.18; envelope-from=eric@ericabrahamsen.net; helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tim Cross , org-mode list , Christian Moe Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 1.25 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=ericabrahamsen.net header.s=mail header.b=Sd0crUbC; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=ericabrahamsen.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CB9D19402B1 X-Spam-Score: 1.25 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: FVUbgSuX5pBO Carsten Dominik writes: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:13 AM Christian Moe wrote: > >> >> Tim Cross writes: >> >> > Eric Abrahamsen writes: >> > >> >>> Does it actually need a key binding? I've never used it and just use >> >>> to move to the next field, leaving the field blank. >> >> >> >> I assume it's meant for blanking a field you've already typed something >> >> into. But yes, I can't imagine it's a heavily-used command, and I >> >> suspect the C-c binding is mostly mnemonic: "make this field >> >> contain only blanks". >> >> >> > >> > I guess that makes sense, but not convinced the use of a valuable key >> > binding is justified given the need. Then again, others probably have >> > vastly different use cases to mine. >> >> One can also blank a field by pressing immediately after tabbing >> into it. So C-c isn't strictly needed. >> > > Hi, > > I think there would be minimal impact from releasing this key binding. So > I think we could remove it. Well that would be pretty nice, if you don't think it would be too disruptive. Shall I prepare a patch? Thanks, Eric