From: Tim Cross <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bug: fragile org refile cache
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 05:17:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw)
Ihor Radchenko <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Samuel Wales <email@example.com> writes:
>> would it be more useful if it automaticaly generated the cache instead
>> of telling you to runt he command to do so?
> I think so. To be frank, I do not understand the reason why it is not
> done by default.
>> if a solid, perhaps unified, cache existed, would org-id use it too?
> Sure. Why not? I imagine such cache can store the following info:
> org files in system -> per-file cache -> per-heading cache -> ...
I suspect the reason it is not done automatically is that getting that
right for all use cases is very hard to do without adding adverse impact
to performance. A cache which is marked as 'dirty' too often results in
too frequent cache refresh operations, but at the same time, determining
what changes in an org file actually invalidate the cache can be a
process intensive operation. Allowing the user to force cache refresh
when needed is likely a reasonable compromise.
I recall having a lot of trouble getting org-refile to work well for me.
I use it a lot, but it was so long ago, I don't recall how I got to my
final configuration (I think I may have modified my workflow to work
better with what I was able to get working reasonably reliably and
efficiently). I now tend to refile to a fairly static set of paths, so
all works OK.
Sorry I cannot provide anything more substantial. I do understand your
frustration, but not sure what the right fix is. I can see having a
cache which is automatically refreshed when necessary will be
problematic to get working for all use cases. Having the ability to turn
automatic refresh on/off and having the ability to manually force a
refresh will likely always be required.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-29 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-28 16:09 [PATCH] Bug: fragile org refile cache Maxim Nikulin
2021-04-29 0:50 ` Samuel Wales
2021-04-29 1:29 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-04-29 1:34 ` Samuel Wales
2021-04-29 12:45 ` Maxim Nikulin
2021-04-29 14:12 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-04-29 15:04 ` Maxim Nikulin
2021-04-29 16:08 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-04-29 16:51 ` Maxim Nikulin
2021-04-30 16:56 ` Maxim Nikulin
2021-05-01 14:48 ` Maxim Nikulin
2021-05-02 6:59 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-05-04 16:55 ` Maxim Nikulin
2021-05-05 0:53 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-04-29 13:30 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-04-29 19:17 ` Tim Cross [this message]
2021-04-29 22:43 ` Samuel Wales
2021-05-02 7:03 ` Ihor Radchenko
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).