From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2FZWEXj1smNxsgAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 16:17:12 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id WNxfEXj1smPZqwAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 16:17:12 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24898B0B9 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 16:17:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pCMYR-0003Y2-ID; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 10:16:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pCMYO-0003Xa-AX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 10:16:44 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pCMYL-0006qB-6M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 10:16:43 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B73E2402CC for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 16:16:39 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1672672599; bh=Uy48a+2WexZp+cGhzg7JWhQas0P57ywypgLai2WriFI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=CjRYNf/522/CbsWEhfI4hVFpptyz28MVa0wu/B/YrnA5t0co+/RH1IfYI9WCo0DbT te5JzJ6iCwE3zbnx1m0UrjxskpXDeuwZAQh6nV2hFkQI5tl1ZWedUEEcXLQiIPpn3i 8eoRybymzs+B3sjd+rvHcZf0nc/s+racsD5GNmLoKCWhy5KkuB9mNGXhSp6hhls6WZ 8uIIWBviK0G4WhzrzbKiIHF5H5fmoq//BPxLOcYFRJu6fTeybqepQ7MBKEVxzwi26l IlgX87/WLWj7jcUZnCX74XZUgs1+lQtnNd1uGyclFXrJx4gS6bYJpJVPjFoAwfDrtn yWfWCNEdGZOgg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Nlzwk6vfwz6tnC; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 16:16:38 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Bastien Guerry Cc: Tom Gillespie , Kyle Meyer , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ob-core: add org-confirm-babel-evaluate-cell custom variable In-Reply-To: <87a631m0ka.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87359ld5ye.fsf@kyleam.com> <874ju0j538.fsf@localhost> <87k02fspxa.fsf@localhost> <87edsii4mo.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6xetbfn.fsf@localhost> <878rips273.fsf@bzg.fr> <878rinadlq.fsf@localhost> <87a631m0ka.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 15:17:09 +0000 Message-ID: <87sfgtklu2.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1672672632; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Na30Btjfte2kuW1Bu44EfgKflK3qkueW5zotUwS3EOYGf9eQpFU3XRvEmigiBPKwroCMvj Vzk9w8S49jkIUbeiymr0e5+jenKs1ullKVPEE7AOkCxg6MYBUqFAQ76xq86i7/Hz5DzJDt 9+HL+kYn03zaHhwMJebiLqmXPZ/+akUzo0iIfh0F39uO64sQWni3N6xje6oe1lT79xZXII ia7HelZsIGq5nXQnvsgJQoVc3rFHc0GkKCNdD3lPn5Ax38Q36NdNuN8z+ro+ZLSnwbgVxz Vnh8OW3UOXXrZfAmdMvcSvE6HKl/j+w38k7FSlYul/USr/uPja10sbnq6/yP8Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="CjRYNf/5"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1672672632; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Uy48a+2WexZp+cGhzg7JWhQas0P57ywypgLai2WriFI=; b=sr7duLk0Q6JBsz3Sj2p4WCIfwrjM0EzT3zkJs06yPz6JBHdb50M/lKYzTurrD40URmjaBs /d2de9pMr58C1uVvZQ28B/8rpDOmaiB5Ii3wI3D2DqJlLOQth15FEuDm/TPV5vnQbBOZ+J tImY8KGxDCa5u1S+2Jbfzwula+qWyqaJwx0aPyg278OmLRefpS6Nyoz8fk6Dt0fEELSPLL 5OvrOXvsCEvyqLN9ZvvSfogL+tO1iYqhKX8YuY5rwjvdrpig205Cc6fw7q8/8wSDZDLJjO em5JQTlPnKG16sbcrZHJv4AMXZsog6zGr4Jq1bwjFcax1QRbeQcDzitMrsuw4w== X-Spam-Score: -11.59 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 24898B0B9 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="CjRYNf/5"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -11.59 X-TUID: HgC+e4SVfU7r Bastien Guerry writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> We may, however, make `org-confirm-babel-evaluate' function value accept >> an extra third argument - context ('code or 'vars). This will retain the >> required flexibility without introducing an extra variable. > > Yes, this is an interesting possibility. See my other email where I suggested a more elaborate approach. >> P.S. Considering intense discussion around the topic, what about >> reverting my commit from the release? We can then re-consider the whole >> design and apply something more elaborate later. > > I see you did the revert already: this is fine by me. =F0=9F=91=8D --=20 Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at