Re: [PATCH] lisp/org-element.el: Add repeater-deadline support to org-element

[Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>]

Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith@outlook.com> writes:

> See two patches attached.  One for org and one for worg.  Tests still
> pass on my end.

Thanks!

>> In addition to changes in Org git, you also need to update
>> https://orgmode.org/worg/org-syntax.html#Timestamps and
>> https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-element-api.html(the page source is at https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg)
>
> Done.  Sort of.  My change in org-syntax.org now implies that a repeater
> must come before a delay.  I don't know what syntax to use that doesn't
> make that implication.  Although I don't see the harm in telling people
> to put the repeater first.

We can simply leave the previous REPEATER-OR-DELAY, but expand on it
that REPEATER-OR-DELAY is an instance of REPEATER or an instance of
DELAY. Does it make sense?

>> This will match timestamps like <2012-03-29 Thu +1y2y>. You may instead
>> use shy group \(?:...\)? around the whole /2y regexp match. (Or even
>> rewrite the regexp via rx for better readability, while we are on it).
>
> Done.  It's my first time using rx though.  I don't know if I should be
> compiling it or something for performance?

`rx' is a macro. It will be expanded during compilation.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>