Re: [PATCH worg v2] ob-doc-gnuplot.org: Fix broken link to source.

[Suhail Singh <suhailsingh247@gmail.com>]

Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:

> I have realized that ob-doc-gnuplot.org and org-babel-gnuplot.org files are
> quite similar.

Good catch!

The latter have not got some recent update though. I think, the
> former may use noweb to have source code blocks active while using the same
> content for exporting with header arguments.

> Are there any other reason why duplicated content exists? I would drop
> one file to avoid divergence.

Looking briefly into it, it's not clear to me that the inclusion of
org-babel-gnuplot.org in commit 394a6326881fc1f077ca8f4b891d8f133f80d305
wasn't an accident.

It might make sense to include an examples/plotting.org at some point,
with very different content.  But as things stand today I believe of the
two files ob-doc-gnuplot.org is the one that should be retained and if
there's any meaningful information contained in org-babel-gnuplot.org
which isn't yet in ob-doc-gnuplot.org that it should be assimilated into
ob-doc-gnuplot.org.

PS: please include my address in replies.

-- 
Suhail