From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-table.el: Calc formulas evaluate to #ERROR.
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:25:43 +0200
Message-ID: <87r5662vh4.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAE9aC8Ubn7ehus0_z86JpT8f+AOLWPwC2x5tzCrQCpz6o1XXzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<8739im5sxw.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkkutmbw.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44100)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QdgL7-0003Am-DB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 06:25:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QdgL5-0002pv-5p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 06:25:17 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52]:41599)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QdgL4-0002pJ-KN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 06:25:14 -0400
Received: by fxd18 with SMTP id 18so4481957fxd.39
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 03:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87zkkutmbw.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Mon, 04
	Jul 2011 10:41:07 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Maciek Starzyk <mstarzyk@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Eric,

Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:

> unfortunately, it does not seem to have been applied quite correctly.
> The following should correct the latest version:

Applied, thanks for your careful testing/checking.

I definitely need to release soon and to stop doing things
too fast...

-- 
 Bastien