From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: empty footnotes in ODT export
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:44:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87r4ydrpfg.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87ehud5wt1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8139atyt11.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52172)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Rt2bn-0004SA-LF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:46:16 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Rt2bj-0007p5-J6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:46:15 -0500
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:59543)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Rt2bj-0007oz-El
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:46:11 -0500
Received: by wgbdt13 with SMTP id dt13so2377731wgb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:46:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8139atyt11.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Fri, 03
	Feb 2012 00:14:26 +0530")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:

> Fix is in your court. Here is my analysis.

Indeed, I introduced that problem with the previous attempt to fix the
other bug.  I think it's good now.

Thanks for your analysis.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou