From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: org-element
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:25:18 +0100
Message-ID: <87r4k8wke9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <loom.20130222T122955-421@post.gmane.org>
	<20130222131437.GA8541@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41766)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1U8scu-0002yz-1G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:25:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1U8scs-0003Ah-SC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:25:23 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:48279)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1U8scs-0003Aa-LC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:25:22 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id o1so718618wic.11
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:25:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20130222131437.GA8541@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> (Suvayu Ali's
	message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:14:37 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> writes:

> I use LaTeX blocks.  So your example would translate to:
>
> #+begin_latex
>   \begin{equation}
>     r = a
>     + b
>     - c
>   \end{equation}
> #+begin_latex
>
> With easy templates, entering blocks is trivial (<l for LaTeX
> blocks).

Of course, the next question is whether we want to force \[ .. \]
equations to be inlined (with no newline inside) or not.  But I let
Nicolas ask and answer this question :)

-- 
 Bastien