From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Support Freemind/Freeplane export
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:14:14 +0530
Message-ID: <87r4jwjs41.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87r4jxr834.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip59xz4i.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87lia51llv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40710)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1UCCxW-0005Z4-Sg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:44:27 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1UCCxV-0002C0-TJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:44:26 -0500
Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:37283)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1UCCxV-0002Bu-N4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:44:25 -0500
Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id kq12so2709586pab.1
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 09:44:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87lia51llv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 02 Mar
	2013 23:29:48 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>

Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes:

> Also, the change in ox-html.el is not good IMHO: it will populate
> everyone's HTML code with unfamiliar strings (like "&#xa0;" instead
> of "&nbsp;") just for the sake of keeping ox-freemind.el users happy.

How many people are going to read HTML code?  There is correctness and
there is readability.  Those who actually read HTML code better know
what they are looking at.  Remember the character in question are
occurring here and there and not everywhere.

Adding a filter function will only add a moving part.  It could be a
robust moving part, but it is a moving part nevertheless.

In short, the concern you have raised is more cosmetic than functional.

--