From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: latex and bibliography? Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:50:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87r4g25fmw.fsf@pank.home> References: <87mwqriir0.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5aavint.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41403) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoDLj-00040i-BW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:50:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoDLi-0000hW-Fr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:50:31 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoDLh-0000hK-UB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:50:30 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UoDLf-00030L-Va for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:50:27 +0200 Received: from e178247163.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.247.163]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:50:27 +0200 Received: from rasmus by e178247163.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:50:27 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > I don't know much about references and bibliographies in org (there have > been some discussions recently on the list I think but I haven't > followed them), but AFAIK the \bibliography stuff is just text as far as > org is concerned and is passed verbatim to the output file. It just > happens that when the output file is processed through latex and > friends, they can make some sense out of it. The rest of the world (org > included and all its exporters) remains blissfully ignorant - that's my > story in any case and until somebody proves me wrong, I'm sticking with > it. It's pretty much true. There's a org-bibtex or an ox-bibtex. Neither work to my satisfaction. The best solution that I've tried is still links (there was a new solutions posed recently (on github) and there's Zotero-integration as well, which I haven't tried). Using \cite{.} directly is frail as it can break over lines. –Rasmus -- Don't panic!!!