From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: Should comments break paragraphs? Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:55:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87r4ey3mur.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <51E443F6.2050104@arfer.net> <87mwpnfybn.fsf@gmail.com> <51E47BC1.7010808@gmail.com> <87ip0byoqg.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehazymua.fsf@gmail.com> <87vc4a3oje.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <871u6yzyfj.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uz13B-00087v-SG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:56:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uz13A-00059n-CB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:56:01 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uz139-00059h-TT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:56:00 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uz132-0006U6-2I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:55:52 +0200 Received: from genepi110.genepi.med.uni-goettingen.de ([134.76.140.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:55:52 +0200 Received: from andreas.leha by genepi110.genepi.med.uni-goettingen.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:55:52 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Andreas Leha writes: > >> In that case, I guess some confusion might come from LaTeX, for example, >> where also the newline is ignored by the comment, s.t. in LaTeX >> ,---- >> | Some text >> | % comment >> | Some other text >> `---- >> is interpreted as >> ,---- >> | Some text >> | Some other text >> `---- > > Comparing Org and LaTeX is like comparing apples and oranges: it can > only lead to false assumptions and cloud thinking. > Agreed. I just wanted to mention one possible source of such false assumptions. >> IMO, there is no 'feature' in the 'paragraph breaking' comments in >> org. But I understand that it is quite hard to change that behaviour. > > Just to be clear. I didn't talk about a "feature". I merely described > the state of affairs, and added that, albeit not perfect, it seemed good > enough to me. I hope I did not offend you with that paragraph. I did not want to say that you called it a feature. If was merely a summary of the thread, as I understood it. I actually never ran into the problem myself, as I do not comment too much in my org files. So I am in the 'good enough' group as well. Regards, Andreas