From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Marking/highlighting text temporarily Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:28:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87r3qdssl1.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87iockmyxy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bnicshhc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r3r57zre.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lhhb2uot.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87oam7p6a7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw1r865s.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878udahabq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pp6m5qy4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <873837gyn9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d21yw6m6.fsf@pank.eu> <87lhgmrtrd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k2w6uit7.fsf@gmx.us> <87zj51ubpg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878uclua33.fsf@gmx.us> <87twv9ken8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOqP-0007zt-1u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 13:28:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOqL-0001mp-HD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 13:28:49 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:53723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOqL-0001mk-6p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 13:28:45 -0400 Received: from x200s ([104.238.169.146]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lb5nF-1ZaaE10yRl-00khfF for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:28:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87twv9ken8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 18 May 2015 18:56:59 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> Fine whit me. For that I I have inlinetasks. > > Then it cannot even replace inlinetasks. Is that a goal? >> Its virtues are compactness, being similar to a list, being C-k friendly, >> and, IMO, more intuitive. > > But, IMO, totally useless for general annotations. I think "totally useless" stretching it. Two examples. [@:1] My sentence on foo [@] and something else * Annotations [@:1:Nicolas] Remember to refer to bar #+TODO: Notes/Nicolas My sentence on foo [Notes/Nicolas: Remember to refer to bar] and something else. The latter is less precise, but I would still prefer it. I guess you could add references to an endnote for long notes, which would bring it closer to killing org-inlinetasks. > This probably means they shouldn't share the same syntax. Note I'm all > for replacing inlinetasks with something else (i.e., change syntax), > albeit this is no simple task. I don't particularly care for them either. =E2=80=94Rasmus --=20 This space is left intentionally blank