From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: org-collector unable to handle macros Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:41:06 -0400 Message-ID: <87r3m5klpp.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> References: <55E0FCB4.2000305@verizon.net> <87mvx73wnz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egij3w4b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1xshgtf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bndbd1t1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaQSD-0002HX-VM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:41:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaQSA-0006iK-TV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:41:33 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaQSA-0006h0-Dz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:41:30 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaQS8-0005gg-9b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:41:28 +0200 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:41:28 +0200 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:41:28 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Mark Edgington writes: > Aaron Ecay gmail.com> writes: > >> >> This looks like the same problem I reported (and provided a patch for) here: >> nicolasgoaziou.fr>. Some orgtbl-* >> functions can’t cope with macro (or macro-resembling) text, because they >> use the exporter, which expects all macros to have valid definitions. >> >> Hopefully this time the bug can actually get fixed, instead of becoming >> bogged down in irrelevant aspects of the context in which it is >> reported. >> > > The link you provided doesn't seem to be a valid URL. Can you check it, and > post a new one? In a (probably vain) attempt to make life harder for spammers, gmane mangles email addresses by changing the "@" sign (shift-2 on US keyboards[fn:1]) to " ". If you reverse that transformation on the link above, you'll get to the article - which BTW can also be found at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/93840 Nick Footnotes: [fn:1] Note that even though I typed it literally above, gmane will most probably change it to the mangled form when you see this.