From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Space after an inline emacs call affects output on export
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:11:35 +0100
Message-ID: <87r3einapk.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <87vb3unct3.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87h9fediaq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34554)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1annFG-0001nQ-1Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:11:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1annFC-0005Ez-Mw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:11:41 -0400
Received: from mail-am1on0145.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([157.56.112.145]:32352
	helo=emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1annFC-0005Es-EP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:11:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87h9fediaq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:37:49 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Wednesday,  6 Apr 2016 at 14:37, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Wild guess. You forbade ":" after emphasis markers in
> `org-emphasis-regexp-components'.

Ummm, I've never touched org-emphasis-regexp-components...

But I have played around with org-emphasis-alist, introducing @ as an
emphasis marker (as I did a long time ago to introduce \alert{} for
beamer per v8).  <blush>  So although @@latex:@@ etc. still works fine,
it has implications elsewhere.  I will remove my change to
org-emphasis-alist.

However, I am curious as to why the output from the inline source
evaluation is different?  I.e. why =xxx= versus xxx?  What is the
rationale for one versus the other?

Thanks,
eric
-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.92.1, Org release_8.3.4-705-g716e33