From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtPVF0gQSBuZXcgd2ViIGJyb3dzZXLigL0=?= Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:32:20 +0800 Message-ID: <87r3ee6vnv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87potzvlp0.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wpo7a56g.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8760vq50d8.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48804) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ap5Av-0001Wz-HR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 22:32:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ap5As-0001d8-Aq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 22:32:33 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ap5As-0001cw-4c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 22:32:30 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ap5Aq-0005wc-1M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:32:28 +0200 Received: from 222.128.163.222 ([222.128.163.222]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:32:28 +0200 Received: from eric by 222.128.163.222 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:32:28 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Adam Porter writes: >> >>> Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: >>> >>>> https://vivaldi.com/ >>>> >>>> Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes >>>> while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? >>>> Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or emacs-like bindings, or >>>> (hopefully) configurable ones. I, for one, would like to try it out, >>>> though I do not have too high hopes. >>> >>> It looks interesting, but it's not free software, so I have no interest >>> myself. Firefox/Iceweasel has been serving me well since before it was >>> Firefox, and Pentadactyl has been my primary UI to it for a long time. I >>> don't feel like Mozilla is taking it in a good direction anymore, but if it >>> ever gets too bad, there's Iceweasel, and there's Pale Moon (which has >>> committed to "classic" Firefox extension APIs and UI), and there are other >>> alternatives like Conkeror, uzbl, etc. >>> >>> Even if you don't care about free software, Vivaldi is made by former Opera >>> devs, so how do we know they aren't just repeating a cycle? It could go the >>> same direction Opera went and need to be rebooted again. As long as it's >>> proprietary, that's a risk its users will always face. >> >> I've been using Conkeror (based on Xulrunner/Firefox) for a while now, >> and like it enough to stick with it. It's completely keyboard driven, >> which I love. It's also not super stable, nor does it seem to be >> actively maintained, which I don't love. If anyone has recommendations >> for better keyboard-driven browsers, I'd love to hear them... > > Maybe Firefox with keysnail. That's a new one for me -- thanks!