From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtPVF0gQSBuZXcgd2ViIGJyb3dzZXLigL0=?=
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:45:17 -0500
Message-ID: <87r3edv56a.fsf@dustycloud.org>
References: <87potzvlp0.fsf@mbork.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56543)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>) id 1apHYC-0008NK-9S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 11:45:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>) id 1apHY7-00063i-B6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 11:45:24 -0400
Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:56398)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>) id 1apHY7-00063Y-7M
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 11:45:19 -0400
In-reply-to: <87potzvlp0.fsf@mbork.pl>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Cc: Org-Mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Marcin Borkowski writes:

> https://vivaldi.com/
>
> Did anyone hear about it?  Any thoughts/experiences?  "Taking notes
> while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no?
> Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or emacs-like bindings, or
> (hopefully) configurable ones.  I, for one, would like to try it out,
> though I do not have too high hopes.
>
> Best,

It looks interesting, but not interesting enough to replace
Icecat/Firefox for me.

What would be interesting enough to replace it for me: getting browser
sandboxing in place.  This is the one thing that makes Chromium more
appealing than Firefox/Icecat right now... but since all we have is
Icecat, that's what I'm using here!

 - Chris