From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Change visibility for bracket links
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:24:59 +0200
Message-ID: <87r37k5i90.fsf@gmx.us>
References: <87bmyyold3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twcgl9vi.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87wphc8bwn.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42384)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1buipH-0004Qa-Qz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:25:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1buipC-00084V-NS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:25:47 -0400
Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=37127 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1buipC-000826-HO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:25:42 -0400
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1buiov-0005Yr-3t
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:25:25 +0200
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Nick,

Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:

> I'm worried that this would be computationally prohibitive.

I guess something like ‘prettify-symbols--post-command-hook’ could be
used.  When point is within the range of
prettify-symbols--current-symbol-bounds it shows the emphasis marker by
removing the ‘invisible’ text property.  When it leaves, it reapplies the
’invisible’ text property.

As I have not tried to actually code this so I haven’t got a clue whether
my "model" is too simplified to work out in practice.

Rasmus

-- 
This space is left intentionally blank