From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: please read: bug when marking tasks done Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 22:52:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87r2ctertt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87d0paprs6.fsf@gnu.org> <87wonhcpnj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <871s5o8pgf.fsf@gnu.org> <87muobcur7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87woneykuc.fsf@gnu.org> <87y37tzbrd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87muo88up0.fsf@gnu.org> <87y37qxgn8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pnt2neeg.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm4kxqhn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zhrlx0zb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878sz2e3mz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goxmn-0002mM-P0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:52:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goxml-0003rw-R8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:52:45 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:37993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goxmh-0003lX-Dg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:52:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878sz2e3mz.fsf@gnu.org> (cesar mena's message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:22:44 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: cesar mena Cc: Leo Gaspard , emacs-orgmode Hello, cesar mena writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> However, we still need to move forward. So, I suggest to revert the >> change about inactive timestamps. Inactive timestamps cannot be >> repeated. This is less disruptive than the current situation. > > yes, agreed. Done in maint. >> However, I also suggest to add a new hook, run after repeating >> timestamps. With this hook, and a proper, user-specific, markup, it >> should be possible to pick inactive timestamps in the section and >> "repeat" them manually, i.e., on a case-by-case basis. Done too. > another (maybe crazy) idea is to advise org-auto-repeat-maybe and set > org-repeat-re as needed before it gets called. It is possible, but should be done on the user side, not on the Org one. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou