From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 12:02:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87r1zf99ee.fsf@gnu.org> References: <84mua8c4zh.fsf@gmail.com> <87eevjgd85.fsf@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33227) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ixU3q-00015c-41 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 06:02:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87eevjgd85.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Tue, 28 Jan 2020 21:20:42 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Adam Porter Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Adam, Adam Porter writes: > I don't use column view very often, so I may be biased, but anyway: in > the general context of an Agenda buffer, I don't feel like enabling or > disabling column view is the most obviously useful or natural thing to > do, so "C-c C-c" doesn't seem like an appropriate binding to me. In fact, C-c C-c was already deactivating the column view in agenda buffer since a long time. Marco's change just opens the door for more bindings to C-c C-c in agenda buffer - we added `org-agenda-set-tags' so that the behavior is aligned with that of C-c C-c in org buffers. -- Bastien