From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qFWsN88rw15zYAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 00:43:59 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 2PySM88rw15rdgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 00:43:59 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1F8B94050F for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 00:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41170 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaqMN-00075R-Gw for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:43:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaqLn-00074s-HT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:43:19 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:63348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaqLl-00053N-BC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:43:18 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD07C23C0; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:43:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=C/088D8+OP0xgu3LtzozBUKmxWw=; b=gPmicF ua3gbBMrvljd8QzuRI1ldtJniQHMH/Fe4n89xOVCFTAj9oCNbqnmEsDBJwjBtXp7 sceDz4EQnljhFDgOi7KbI60gxRcI+vp6/6SueREQxx9KjdW+hwvSpBlKI0obzY8l HJysEl5tDT7Sshe9j+R0+dmB2dP7/Z2xarL6I= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78222C23BF; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:43:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=kyleam.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=nLuW9NxLfV0NIPVEUfXYE4477Hzg3v7SlBgFrVNMu+Q=; b=DMwmTl5M7ZUoITspC/gjy+UFpjTLFvPZU8dllikMofUqIyhyg6Rqqdk5phRJ/WB/rXUFmzQdiZKYx2mn+w9dZkd1ezwekQboUaoqWNcl8TkmyDkiNf2P3qpznm8EQHTQNeKISoLASvDLVKyhN8u/iOER9wnVRgNYiFj+ClSio/w= Received: from localhost (unknown [45.33.91.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAE2AC23BD; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:43:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) From: Kyle Meyer To: George Sokolsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] agenda: Consider FILETAGS for archive skipping In-Reply-To: <87367xmo7k.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87367xmo7k.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 00:43:10 +0000 Message-ID: <87r1vgsqjl.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B83B8006-9969-11EA-9C99-B0405B776F7B-24757444!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=173.228.157.52; envelope-from=kyle@kyleam.com; helo=pb-smtp20.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/18 20:43:15 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=pobox.com header.s=sasl header.b=gPmicF u; dkim=pass header.d=kyleam.com header.s=mesmtp header.b=DMwmTl5M; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.21 X-TUID: SFaqzpii0BI8 George Sokolsky writes: > I had to apply it manually on the latest org-20200518 (line numbers > changed in this new version or me too lame) - the patch seem to fix the > below problem and works just fine! The patch was against the master branch (specifically 9bc0cc7fb), not the maint branch which is the source of the ELPA archive. > IMHO using "#+FILETAGS: ARCHIVE" is one of legitimate ways of applying > ARCHIVE tag to items in org. I think this statement is a reply to me saying that "I'd guess that it's uncommon to try to set the ARCHIVE tag at the file level [because...]". To be clear, that didn't contain a claim one way or the other about whether "#+FILETAGS: ARCHIVE" is a legitimate way to apply an archive tag. But based on me taking the time to look into a code change, it probably doesn't surprise you that my first thought was "hmph, yeah, seems like that _should_ work". George Sokolsky later writes: > Kyle, could you please apply the patch to the org repository? I sent out the patch so that others have the opportunity to provide feedback on it as well as your initial message. If no one does (which is fine), at some point in the next few days I'll revisit the patch, maybe inspect the surrounding code a bit more, and apply it (assuming I don't end up convincing myself that it's a bad idea or needs more work).