From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id IJYJO4N7XmMxYQAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:26:28 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id mG8hO4N7XmOFkAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:26:27 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F24585A0 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:26:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1op8JW-0006fw-Jj; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 09:25:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1op8JT-0006cq-Sx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 09:25:19 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1op8JQ-0000xA-6V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 09:25:19 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CC4D240104 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:25:13 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1667136313; bh=XSCt7A/wm7mcSIkXYhsy9E7axYmMS8i7ZKpqDr3FzwY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=qGtdFSLmFhNHuWQR7P7ZkuxTeW0ozBH2rcvZ5znt9v/5tnis819gPJoQvqz2cHNWD 97fhUwVyhjTj/Y/B6V3+XRETgYdD5hLhYJn7O6fnaIDIc+AuElO+z8oauK/x28Yih2 H3DuwVjGLSoM6oN3iw7sHdxTmBJaMOZlHoMG40h0F32rOswpgZORZtbBRDIPZYHEic CnAFI3JNIeo/jZAwNm9aZXYgjsNp6HhRVA/tzGfqvYYiCF8u96oEkt7F4cHMfLRuFE LBaBVtE295HbIt+tqxk17aXiReoYBrXRAhVhAFWR2mtUR3+dAvzTtcWRpZumfu7whv L8oYxbZy1Dojw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4N0cTg6rWdz9rxB; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:25:11 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Daniel Kraus Cc: Bastien , numbchild@gmail.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Auto detect ob-clojure backend (was: [PATCH] Fix ob-clojure handling source block variable's value is a org-mode table or list) In-Reply-To: <8735b5mpxc.fsf@kraus.my> References: <62520bbc.1c69fb81.d855b.549fSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <87r0yvoycr.fsf@localhost> <874jvp9wsg.fsf@kraus.my> <87r0yss54r.fsf@bzg.fr> <87zgdg8g2e.fsf@kraus.my> <87o7twqmc4.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsf78xeb.fsf@kraus.my> <87k04j6oic.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkptmu5v.fsf@kraus.my> <87bkpto6yb.fsf@localhost> <8735b5mpxc.fsf@kraus.my> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 13:25:55 +0000 Message-ID: <87r0ypmoik.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1667136387; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=NqqBSgZ5qjO64289ZB7LwmokAhLfu8I1rLMG2FBbvxA=; b=tJp4DeA2Ec3ApvG0NA4NHbZEcrmWoQzCfHN/UWzsXohoJLnVfSLo4BVTTHtvQ2IuDlYiB6 F8XKBPBlTZnJLYETy8f69KV/aEjGOzT6Bt9+x7VwvZ3S7iX7lnKbsq1GMgiO9FPmWUOd4H tcfSou1pTqlaJe+xDBda+TvOeJZtRIdKzDKnHE2NplfWMa4jiT7E6kSIbJnqduFhfLF6o4 evNSMCowhcWuVA0pbwZCWDXE/hEbq++RTCVPeJ3NGl7kj2/6eIaSxixAUDBIdNncPppB5Z q9GcB8l2iCZCfqWHIxpEZ37NrfADJ/1lgxsIesE0fmJqiAFAGcdM1Vn65pjuiA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1667136387; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=az2Us9sqkMVi/6qDYhJFMs4k3b3IJal5BFDz7qF30+KYKUNPMXBE0F8nHoforZSFmLWx4j Juco+A3hmFSqYmftfyBD93Z4hY/SQlSG6d6055ed5V2zGbNCXCW8Qg+EwOkh5pwxsw0MJx INm1879KFdBfk5Aeyzmk+7LyTS9FG/JxXidmws9wuwNtS35TqUh+tqdnoBeDv+4Nvola6K a1xdwpEYclwIueO0lAqLPNbfGO+bskQzF7nKsYyCq6mwSCrchY7vsQeEnuuYgCtGSNb+0+ EzCztdJSs+m0gSPiFMMK8P4Erok8fJI1RW6XO/tq39ZsCIGT4AfCfQ4SFa54Ug== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=qGtdFSLm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.45 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=qGtdFSLm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9F24585A0 X-Spam-Score: -3.45 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Hm6VtTSLYm1z Daniel Kraus writes: >> What if users have, say, cider installed and also babashka executable? >> Will it be expected to use babashka? > > Yes. The only thing that makes me slightly hesitant is that e.g. > someone doesn't have `bb` installed. Executes clojure source blocks > which are then evaluated in, let's say cider. > Then they install `bb` and the next time they start Emacs, the same > source block on re-evaluation would be executed with babashka. > > I think this is still the best out of the box experience as it > "just works" for most users without having to customise something > and if they want it fixed, they can pin it to a certain backend. > > What's your opinion? I agree. Though if you want to go really fancy, you can utilize org-persist to store the customization value in persistent cache (org-persist-register), load it back (org-persist-read), and re-use when the cached backend can be enabled. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at