emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: cezar@mixandgo.ro
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: org mode vs basecamp
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:06:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87prz4c24s.fsf@myhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87prz5zin1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx

Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes:

>
> Before we go further into this discussion, let me raise again a concern
> that many in this list expressed before me: Org should stick to the Unix
> coding principle, i.e. « do one thing and do it well. » Org-mode handles
> to-do lists, and it does it well.
>
> There is no need to make Org a full-fledged project management system;
> but if such a system is able to interact (edit/store) in some way with
> Org's file format, then it's worth to explore this way.
>

You're half right !

When someone needs some tool to get things done it's either ok or move
to the next one. Doing just TODO lists is fine but incomplete for the
bigger picture. I use emacs to code so org-mode is fine cause it right
there and I don't have to start some other agenda app. 

Hmmm this idea just hit me : How about using ICS files ?
I am not too familiar with them but I think they pretty much do what I
need !?

>> Things that are not there (or are not obvious):
>>
>> 1. Collaboration
>
> If you share a file with other people, you can assign a task to someone
> by adding a :Owner: property.
>

What can a simple TAG do ? If the other people don't use ORG. Each user
should only see his tasks.

>> 2. Comments (blog style)
>
> To me the content of an entry looks like "comments".
>
>> 3. Attachments (various projects need different files)
>
> Well, you can do this with links.

You still need a "place" to store them and a way to upload.

>
>> 4. Views (client view / company view)
>
> Aren't sparse-tree/agenda views enough?
>

I am not sure, I just use C-c a a :D

>
> I think the whole issue is not "How to make Org a collaborative tool for
> project management" but rather: "Is it worth trying to implement a web
> application that uses Org format for storing/exchanging information?"
>
> And I don't have any answer to that!
>

I am not sure either. But I do need one :D

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-24  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-23  9:17 org mode vs basecamp cezar
2007-10-23 17:09 ` Bastien
2007-10-23 18:43   ` cezar
2007-10-23 20:21     ` Bastien
2007-10-24  9:06       ` cezar [this message]
2007-10-24 10:26         ` Bastien
2007-10-24 10:52           ` cezar
2007-10-24 12:05             ` Bastien
2007-10-24  7:27   ` Stefan Kamphausen
2007-10-24  9:43     ` Bastien
2007-10-24  8:58       ` Stefan Kamphausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87prz4c24s.fsf@myhost.localdomain \
    --to=cezar@mixandgo.ro \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).