From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Vauban?= Subject: Re: Org-special-blocks for code chunks Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:31:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87prb0yphr.fsf@mundaneum.com> References: <87ab26we7h.fsf@mundaneum.com> <86ocqms381.fsf@portan.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Chris, Chris Gray wrote: > S=C3=A9bastien Vauban wrote: >> I have a problem exporting code chunks to LaTeX (beamer, in fact -- but >> that does not change anything to the problem) that contain underscores. >> I can't get a properly outputted underscore in my slide. >> Any idea or workaround? > > Is lstlisting like a verbatim environment? Yes, it is. What's extra is the highlight of keywords, contextual for every programming language. > I think you might be able to just use \begin{lstlisting} > and \end{lstlisting} in that case. Org does not interpret anything inside > such blocks, which is why org-special-blocks was created in the first pla= ce. OK. That works. Though, I'm lost about choosing the best representation for code chunks (I don't even speak here of literate programming) to be shown in slides or documents. Look, I've done an ECM with the different ways I currently see for Org-mode: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- * Org *** A. To escape the \_ ***** 1. No marking at all \begin{lstlisting} months_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} ***** 2. Literal LaTeX code #+LaTeX: \begin{lstlisting} months_employed(?applicant, ?months) #+LaTeX: \end{lstlisting} ***** 3. Lines between markers #+BEGIN_LaTeX \begin{lstlisting} months_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} #+END_LaTeX ***** 4. Org-special-blocks #+BEGIN_lstlisting months_employed(?applicant, ?months) #+END_lstlisting *** B. Or not to escape the _? ***** 1. No marking at all \begin{lstlisting} months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} ***** 2. Literal LaTeX code #+LaTeX: \begin{lstlisting} months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) #+LaTeX: \end{lstlisting} ***** 3. Lines between markers #+BEGIN_LaTeX \begin{lstlisting} months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} #+END_LaTeX ***** 4. Org-special-blocks #+BEGIN_lstlisting months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) #+END_lstlisting --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Without org-special-blocks, I have such LaTeX generated: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- % Created 2009-08-13 Thu 12:07 \documentclass[final]{mcreport} \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{xcolor} \usepackage{listings} \title{ecm-escape} \author{Fabrice Niessen} \date{13 August 2009} \begin{document} \maketitle \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \tableofcontents \vspace*{1cm} \section{Org} \label{sec-1} \subsection{A. To escape the \_} \label{sec-1.1} \subsubsection{1. No marking at all} \label{sec-1.1.1} \begin{lstlisting} months_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \subsubsection{2. Literal \LaTeX{} code} \label{sec-1.1.2} \begin{lstlisting} months_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \subsubsection{3. Lines between markers} \label{sec-1.1.3} \begin{lstlisting} months_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \subsubsection{4. Org-special-blocks} \label{sec-1.1.4} months$_{\mathrm{employed}}$(?applicant, ?months) \subsection{B. Or not to escape the _?} \label{sec-1.2} \subsubsection{1. No marking at all} \label{sec-1.2.1} \begin{lstlisting} months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \subsubsection{2. Literal \LaTeX{} code} \label{sec-1.2.2} \begin{lstlisting} months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \subsubsection{3. Lines between markers} \label{sec-1.2.3} \begin{lstlisting} months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \subsubsection{4. Org-special-blocks} \label{sec-1.2.4} months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{document} --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- With org-special-blocks turned on, I have: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- % Created 2009-08-13 Thu 12:10 \documentclass[final]{mcreport} \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{xcolor} \usepackage{listings} \title{ecm-escape} \author{Fabrice Niessen} \date{13 August 2009} \begin{document} \maketitle \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \tableofcontents \vspace*{1cm} \section{Org} \label{sec-1} \subsection{A. To escape the \_} \label{sec-1.1} \subsubsection{1. No marking at all} \label{sec-1.1.1} \begin{lstlisting} months_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \subsubsection{2. Literal \LaTeX{} code} \label{sec-1.1.2} \begin{lstlisting} months_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \subsubsection{3. Lines between markers} \label{sec-1.1.3} \begin{\LaTeX{}} \begin{lstlisting} months_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \end{\LaTeX{}} \subsubsection{4. Org-special-blocks} \label{sec-1.1.4} \begin{lstlisting} months$_{\mathrm{employed}}$(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \subsection{B. Or not to escape the _?} \label{sec-1.2} \subsubsection{1. No marking at all} \label{sec-1.2.1} \begin{lstlisting} months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \subsubsection{2. Literal \LaTeX{} code} \label{sec-1.2.2} \begin{lstlisting} months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \subsubsection{3. Lines between markers} \label{sec-1.2.3} \begin{\LaTeX{}} \begin{lstlisting} months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \end{\LaTeX{}} \subsubsection{4. Org-special-blocks} \label{sec-1.2.4} \begin{lstlisting} months\_employed(?applicant, ?months) \end{lstlisting} \end{document} --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Conclusions? - Org-special-blocks seems to misbehave in cases A3/B3 (adding an unsound environment) and A4 (letting the underscore being converted); - Cases 1 and 2 always work as expected: producing me what I want for the "A series", and something expected (but not what I want to see in the docume= nt) for the "B series" (just there for informative purpose -- because, anyway= , I don't wanna see the underscore, nowhere, neither having to type it, neith= er printing it in the docs); - Cases A1 and A3 are the nicest to read in Org: code chunks are highlighted differently. - Though, case A1 is not very friendly: nothing tells I'm inline LaTeX code (what about other exports, as HTML and the like?) - Thought, case A2 is the one I currently choose for the slides I'm produci= ng, as it both works whenever org-special-blocks is activated and when it's n= ot. Any comments? Seb --=20 S=C3=A9bastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode