From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: descriptions about org-cycle is separated
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:14:53 -0500
Message-ID: <87pqfk14le.fsf@norang.ca>
References: <291B434D-FF0D-412A-9DBA-9EDDCE056FB2@ieee.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51351)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RcnMC-00030v-FR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:15:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RcnMB-0007k7-7c
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:15:00 -0500
Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:23252
	helo=mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RcnMB-0007k2-3B
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:14:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <291B434D-FF0D-412A-9DBA-9EDDCE056FB2@ieee.org> (Takaaki
	ISHIKAWA's message of "Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:24:03 +0900")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Takaaki ISHIKAWA <takaxp@ieee.org>
Cc: Orgmode List Mailing <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Takaaki ISHIKAWA <takaxp@ieee.org> writes:

> Descriptions about org-cycle is separated in the
> Org manual, section 2.7.
>
> http://orgmode.org/manual/Plain-lists.html#Plain-lists
>
> Is there any reason for this?

Not that I know of.  They should probably be merged into a single entry.

Regards,
Bernt