From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois?= Pinard) Subject: Clock time implied as 00:00 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:57:10 -0500 Message-ID: <87pqf7b9jt.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37321) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RgJI6-0006uD-C1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:57:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RgJI0-0006Kq-P7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:57:18 -0500 Received: from 206-248-137-202.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.137.202]:57071 helo=mercure.epsilon-ti.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RgJI0-0006KX-Kh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:57:12 -0500 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Org people. This morning, I just noticed this line: CLOCK: [2011-12-29 jeu 9:30]--[2011-12-29 jeu 11:44] =3D> 11:44 because of the strange 11:44 total. My error is clear, as I wrote 9:30 instead of 09:30. Correcting it gives a move reasonable total: CLOCK: [2011-12-29 jeu 09:30]--[2011-12-29 jeu 11:44] =3D> 2:14 Yet, forgetting a leading 0 is an easy mistake (I know I should not make mistakes!), and then, maybe (I'm not sure) Org mode could deliver unexpected or misleading statistics out of a silent error. Not such a problem for me, yet it could have become one if I missed it. Would it be reasonable to suggest that Org mode be more lenient about missing leading zeroes? Fran=C3=A7ois P.S. I wish every one is enjoying the Festive Times!