From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: org-babel order of evaluation
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:56:19 -0700
Message-ID: <87pqeas34l.fsf@gmx.com>
References: <20120112002506.GA26183@BigDog.local> <87y5td7z2t.fsf@gmx.com>
	<CADzxs1mgxV=M_k4wUBiTe9hoNO65ii8Op9BVQ8wKVa_cx0wQ1w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120112225129.GA26670@BigDog.local> <87ipkgqu8w.fsf@gmx.com>
	<20120113015244.GA27002@BigDog.local>
	<CADzxs1=juJXkwMHSN38SGay8KPMcS6DWv=j6NzTac6fszpcv7A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43079)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1RpOL4-0003Yi-87
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:09:59 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1RpOKy-0000MT-Qn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:09:54 -0500
Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:53917)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1RpOKy-0000LP-Lh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:09:48 -0500
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo Alekseyev <dnquark@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Leo Alekseyev <dnquark@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:07:41PM -0700, Eric Schulte wrote:
>>> Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com> writes:
>>>
>>> Turns out it was not that difficult to change this behavior. =C2=A0You =
and
>>> Leo are both correct that in-buffer-order evaluation is more natural and
>>> expected than the previous behavior. =C2=A0I've just pushed up a fix af=
ter
>>> which evaluating the following
>
> Eric,
> The fix doesn't seem to be working for me when I export the buffer to
> HTML.

My previous fix only set the order of evaluation for interactive buffer
evaluation.  I've just pushed up another fix which sets the order of
evaluation during export.

Best,

> The ordering of call and source blocks once again becomes randomized,
> and in general, exported file is missing a bunch of stuff unless I run
> org-babel-execute-buffer prior to export.  Since the export engine
> does its own evaluation, it doesn't seem like org-babel-execute-buffer
> should be a necessity.  But I can't run org-babel-execute-buffer on
> anything with a src_<language> inline block as it gives me an error.
>
> I'm attaching two files which do not export correctly, at least when
> one doesn't run org-babel-execute-buffer; just do C-c C-e h and look
> at the output.
>
> --Leo
>
>

--=20
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/