From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: [feature request] org-insert-heading Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:43:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87pqdll0z4.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <87hayy8lsh.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87vcndsoyl.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGzR-0004T9-K8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGzQ-0003LI-3x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:01 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58341) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGzP-0003LD-Tw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:00 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RwGzM-0007AL-Vi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:43:56 +0100 Received: from pd9eb2c26.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.235.44.38]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:43:56 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb2c26.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:43:56 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > By default, M-RET is allowed to split lines, and therefore contents. Let me re-formulate my request: If the point is at EOL, there actually is no line to split and it would be far more logical if the new heading/item would simply be inserted after the current one (including any subtree that belongs to the current item). > You may use the following to achieve the desired effect: > > (setq org-M-RET-may-split-line '((item) (default . t))) I actually like the ability to split lines with M-RET, especially since there doesn't seem to be a sane way to tell org that "yes I want to split the line this time". What I want is that "point at EOL" is recognized as a special situation, much like "point at BOL" already is. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf Blofeld V1.15B11: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada