From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: org babel execute shell in sh? Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:34:39 -0600 Message-ID: <87pqchg6ab.fsf@gmx.com> References: <87fwdj67q2.fsf@goochesa.de> <3596.1331353274@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58865) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S77f5-0002UH-98 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:59:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S77el-0000QY-1y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:59:46 -0400 Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:42969) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S77ek-0000Ft-Qt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:59:30 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Tom Regner Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Panruo Wu > > But I'm often bitten by the distinction between export and tangling -- > :padline, :shebang come to mind, where I expected org-babel to honour > the setting in both cases. > Could you describe a use case where these options would be used for exporting and would be preferable to simply including the padding lines or the shebang literally in the code block? -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/