From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Checkboxes for description lists Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:45:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87pq8wzyn4.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87mx4ceh32.fsf@gmail.com> <80r4tkfzn8.fsf@somewhere.org> <87zk88d5f7.fsf@gmail.com> <80y5nq44wb.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45147) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SgZWO-0006QJ-6e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:49:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SgZWI-0005yK-2K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:49:23 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SgZWH-0005wq-Om for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:49:17 -0400 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SgZW9-0007qX-Ny for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:49:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <80y5nq44wb.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:30:28 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org Hello, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> "Sebastien Vauban" >> writes: >> >>> It seems we can't put footnotes in the left part of the >>> description. Is it intended? Could that restriction be removed? >> >> That's not really intended, and the fix is easy, but I have a question >> first: how would it be rendered in LaTeX? >> >> Apparently, >> >> "\item[tag text\footnote{contents}] item's contents" >> >> isn't valid. > > I would then say just after the [...] part, so that it stays closer to where > we want to put it. > > But, then, you'll say the user can already do that. True. I've added support for footnote references in item tags. Since it's quite tricky in LaTeX back-end (as much as nested footnote references), I'd appreciate if you could test it and tell me if it works as expected. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou