From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "Generic" Source block language specification?
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 08:02:43 -0700
Message-ID: <87pq34gy49.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <50ACE060.4030207@gmail.com> <87624xi5pz.fsf@gmail.com>
	<50AF3123.40708@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46709)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Tbumy-0003Vn-AI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:03:38 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Tbums-00015B-8K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:03:32 -0500
Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:36670)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Tbums-00013l-0g
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:03:26 -0500
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 10so16509188ied.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 07:03:23 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com> writes:

> On 23/11/12 00:17, Eric Schulte wrote:
>> Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> I have in a document a definition of a projection, which is essentially a text as follow:
>>> 
>>> #+BEGIN_src +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25 +lat_2=-29.75 +lat_0=29 +lon_0=30.75 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 
>>> +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs #+END_src
>>> 
>>> Now this does obviously not export, as the source block language is missing. Is there a way
>>> that I can get the same formating of the source in the exportes output but without the syntax
>>> highlighting?
>>> 
>>> BEGIN_EXAMPLE END_EXAMPLE
>>> 
>>> is similar, but I would like the block to be formated as the SRC blocks.
>>> 
>> 
>> I bet "fundamental" would work, e.g.,
>
> Yes, it does - works perfectly. Is this documented?
>

Yes.  Whatever language string is placed at the top of the source block
will define the mode used for export and in-block editing.  I believe
that is documented.

Cheers,

>
> Thanks,
>
> Rainer
>
>> 
>> #+begin_src fundamental +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25 +lat_2=-29.75 +lat_0=29 +lon_0=30.75 +x_0=0 
>> +y_0=0 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs #+end_src
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Rainer
>> 
>

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte