From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Some %elements in org-html-postamble-format became too "generous" Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:04:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87ppy6xzjf.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8761zyzhf5.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42132) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOpGn-00056r-ET for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 09:04:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOpGk-000648-Lx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 09:04:29 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]:33373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOpGk-000642-De for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 09:04:26 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id d46so3951456wer.16 for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 06:04:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8761zyzhf5.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> (Dieter Wilhelm's message of "Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:52:46 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Dieter Wilhelm Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Dieter Wilhelm writes: > before 8pre it was better possible to translate the Org/Emacs information in the > postamble. If I'm using > > ("fr" "

Auteur: %a (%e)

\n

Date > de la modification: %d

\n

Produit par %c >

\n") > > The result looks like: > > Produit par Generated by Org mode 8.0-pre in Emacs 24.3.3 > > which also contradicts the documentation string of > org-html-postamble-format... I fixed this. "%c" equals to `org-html-creator-string' (#+CREATOR:) value. You are responsible for the translation. > By the way, I think the creation Time (%T) capability of the postamble > is rather pointless, could you please change it to the modification time > or add something (like %C)? This would save the hassle of putting > everywhere #+DATE: {{{modification-time(%Y-%m-%d)}}} into the files. > One could just change the %d to %C... I added %C. > Moreover, I think the documentation string is not really precise about > the creation time. We have on Linux atime, mtime and ctime (Access, > Modification and in effect the inode "Change" time), probably the modern > file systems store additionally the "true Creation" time. This was about the creation time of the /output/, which is, in fact, the time of export. I changed the docstring to make it clear. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou