From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: Exporting an article to a (very) specific formatting template Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:14:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppxcm4od.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXEsu-0004TB-RF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:02:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXEst-0000rO-PI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:02:36 -0400 Received: from ch1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.184]:50229 helo=ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXEst-0000rI-Ll for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:02:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: (James Harkins's message of "Tue, 30 Apr 2013 01:57:51 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: James Harkins Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org James Harkins writes: [...] > Ok, based on this and Marcin's comments, I'll do it the LaTeX way (which was > my first choice anyway). I think this is a good choice. It's what I try to do whenever possible. And for cases where the submission is meant to be "camera ready", the latex produced papers always stand out because they just simply look better! -- : Eric S Fraga, GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D : in Emacs 24.3.50.1 and Org release_8.0-alpha-307-g3a0e55.dirty