From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Error with \usepackage{amsmath} due to \iint already being defined Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 14:38:42 -0400 Message-ID: <87ppwgusst.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44831) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfwtK-00028e-Qe for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:39:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfwtF-0002kA-U9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:39:02 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfwtF-0002jx-O4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:38:57 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UfwtD-0003Hi-1o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 20:38:55 +0200 Received: from pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.7.96.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 20:38:55 +0200 Received: from ndokos by pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 20:38:55 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org John Hendy writes: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Vincent Beffara wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> I tracked down an error about \iint already being defined to a clash >>> between wasysym and amsmath. I brought in amsmath, but it appears that >>> wasysym is an Org LaTeX export default package. >> >> Just put this in the LaTeX header before you load amsmath: >> >> \usepackage{savesym} >> \savesymbol{iint} >> \savesymbol{iiint} >> > > Does this savewasysym's definition if iint instead of amsmath's? In > the case that I actually use \iint (super unlikely, but not > impossible), which package's is preferred? > The wasysym docs say that there should be no conflict, but that seems to be wrong: ISTR multiple instances of this conflict. If you prefer the amsmath integral signs over the wasysym ones, then probably the best thing to do is to load wasysym with the ``nointegrals'' option: \usepackage[nointegrals]{wasysym} This can be done permanently by customizing org-latex-default-packages-alist and adding the option to the wasysym entry. -- Nick