From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [Feature Request] Make property-drawers exportable Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:33:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87ppvkiz8b.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8738shvzaj.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uoact-0006a5-8E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:41:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoaUO-00033Q-8K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:33:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]:55822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoaUN-000335-OP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:32:59 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id y10so2505074wgg.32 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:32:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8738shvzaj.fsf@gmail.com> (Thorsten Jolitz's message of "Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:53:24 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Thorsten Jolitz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Thorsten Jolitz writes: > for me property-drawers are a very useful feature of Org-mode, since > the need to store meta-data for a document is so frequent and > property-drawers are human- and machine-readable, easy to handle > interactively and programmatically, and avoid all that nasty redundancy > and accidental variation of giving meta-data as free text. > > However, property-drawers are not exported except separating blank > lines. This is a real pity in my eyes, since parts of an Org-mode > document that can't be exported are visible only to the author of the > document and a few fellows that use the raw Org document too. This might > make sense in some cases, but in others the property information should > be visible in the exported docs too. This has been requested before. Property drawers are Org meta data, they are not for user's cosumption. Though you can export some properties with macros (see {{{property{NAME}}}} macros). You can also create a derived back-end that will handle these elements just fine. AFAIK all backends (excepted "org", for obvious reasons) ignore property drawers, as they should. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou