From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Groth Subject: Re: babel and long-running computations Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:29:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87ppkfsyw0.fsf@grothesque.org> References: <87lhv4qr7l.fsf@grothesque.org> <534FA332.1080304@gmail.com> <87lhv4ut1n.fsf@grothesque.org> <878ur4dutd.fsf@gmail.com> <87ha5suntu.fsf@grothesque.org> <878ur4yn4a.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WapC6-0004U3-Cn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:29:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WapBy-0001fv-Ma for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:29:46 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WapBy-0001fD-GH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:29:38 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WapBs-0006AP-M7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:29:32 +0200 Received: from dra38-5-82-246-248-175.fbx.proxad.net ([82.246.248.175]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:29:32 +0200 Received: from christoph by dra38-5-82-246-248-175.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:29:32 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Schulte writes: > Currently Babel does not have support for long-running computations, > however this feature has been discussed and there are previous > messages on the mailing list and even some comments in the code > outlining a potential implementation strategy. So this may change > if/when someone finds the time and drive to tackle the implementation. Hmm, I searched the list archives before asking of course, but I didn’t find any previous discussion. Could you please provide some references? Thanks, Christoph