From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [patch] extend org-meta-return to keywords Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:54:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppcd3iqj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87egszw8ui.fsf@gmx.us> <87wq6o3u57.fsf@gmx.us> <87fvdb4l6c.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sihb4ede.fsf@pank.eu> <87lhn36nq1.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnny4ybq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <5471C038.4080102@free.fr> <873899503j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8738997sa2.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsbMI-0000uz-8y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:54:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsbMA-0006ob-6p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:54:02 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:37850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsbMA-0006oV-0J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:53:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8738997sa2.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:15:01 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > I don't find it complicated at all. . . It's DWIM! I understand your DWIM argument. But we're talking about one of the most central keybindings in Org, much like C-c C-c. Except I do not consider C-c C-c as a usability model. Also, C-c C-c is not really dedicated to headlines. > The fact that `org-table-wrap-region' is bound to M-RET is the reason > I'd bind `org-insert-keyword' to M-RET. . . I really don't understand the reason behind binding `org-table-wrap-region' (how often do you use that?) on M-RET. > Anyway, do we have /another/ key that these two functions could be > migrated to? There is `org-table-copy-down' bound to S-RET. The idea is similar. Regards,