From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug: HTML export ignoring CUSTOM_ID properties
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 21:21:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87pp6u1why.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87twwefwgz.fsf@jack.tftorrey.com> <871tjhwnd0.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87k2x62gam.wl-n142857@gmail.com> <877ft6aqp2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87h9s63e4p.wl-n142857@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44642)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YlMfR-0000yy-Po
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:20:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YlMfQ-0006UU-Pt
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:20:09 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:60690)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YlMfQ-0006QS-Je
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:20:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87h9s63e4p.wl-n142857@gmail.com> (Daniel Clemente's message of
	"Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:15:18 +0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Daniel Clemente <n142857@gmail.com>
Cc: tftorrey@tftorrey.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>

Daniel Clemente <n142857@gmail.com> writes:

> While the two systems work, I don't see either why the #orgheadline129
> system is better than the #sec-1-4-3-1-2.

Actually is is better because it is consistent. "sec-1-4-3-1-2" is
almost as fragile and doesn't play nice with unnumbered headlines.

However, this is not the reason why this change was introduced.
I explained it already.

> Not important enough to justify a breaking change either.

This is not really a breaking change. AFAIK, "sec-x.x.x" labelling was
never made public. However, you can use CUSTOM_ID to enforce some label
and then refer to it.

> IDs are not only internal. CSS knows about it, JS too, and URLs can be
> built and shared through the web that include org IDs
> (myweb.com/somedoc.html#someid).

ID not specified by the user are internal. "sec-x-x" is an internal
scheme. You can still use CUSTOM_ID for that.

Of course, it is also possible to add an anchor with id "sec-x-x" to
numbered headlines only (maybe as an opt-in so newcomers can at least
read about it). However, I suspect that a filter can do as well.


Regards,