From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Fraga, Eric" <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Bug or not a bug? dot expansion in ob-shell
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:05:27 +0000
Message-ID: <87pnear7tl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <CA+A2iZaziAfMeGpBqL6qGrzrWEVvLvC0DUw++T4gCF3NGuW-DQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87eeur3p1p.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87a75eap8k.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87y2sy3kkl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87r1yq4xiz.fsf@gnu.org>
 <875zg2kcy0.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87h7zmiw0v.fsf@gmail.com>	<871rqqag19.fsf@bzg.fr>
 <87wo8iitzz.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>	<87ftf63d79.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45116)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1j4Pyl-0004qr-BZ
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:05:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1j4Pyk-0003SF-BJ
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:05:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87ftf63d79.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2020
 14:43:06 +0100")
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com>, "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Wednesday, 19 Feb 2020 at 14:43, Bastien wrote:
> Note that currently (9.3) we have this:=20

[...]

> ... so the default today is not even to consider "the last command",
> but the output of all commands.

Maybe, if you wish to get version 9.4 out, the best approach would be to
fix that one outlier case ("." giving "0") for now and later handle
value/output distinction properly (should it be desired, of course)?

--=20
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.3.6-350-g39f1c1