Hi  Adam,

> I’d like to propose some changes to Worg’s CSS that I think make it much
> more readable.  Here are some before/after screenshots:

Thanks for proposing these changes to Worg’s CSS. I have a few thoughts on them,
which I will share below.

> The changes are simply removing some rules, which allows the user’s
> configured browser font settings to be applied, as well as setting the
> max-width of the content to 60em.  In CSS terms, Firefox’s inspector
> provides this copy of the changes:

I’m a big fan of the shift to a fixed em-based max width. However, I’m not quite
sold on a few of the other changes, for instance the font change. While it does
vary, I must say than in particular I find the default serifed font of browsers
somewhat unattractive. Have you considered instead a sans-serif system font
stack? For example, this is what I used on the homepage:
┌────
│ -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, San Francisco, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Ubuntu, Roboto, Noto, Segoe UI, Arial, sans-serif;
└────

Regarding the header colour, while I’m not much of a fan of the original grey,
perhaps this would be a chance to introduce some visual ties with the rest of
the site and the logo, for example by setting the heading colour to `#587e72' (the
dark gree from the Org logo).

I also tend to find the default font size slightly to small on most browsers.
I’d be in favour of bumping up the base fontsize to `1.2rem' and changing the
width restriction from `60em' to `60rem' so it remains constant.

Lastly, on padding, I feel you may have been a bit over-zealous in your removal
of padding from headlines. IMO a bit more space helps visually separate sections
and let them “breath”, and browsers defaults tend to pack things a bit more
densely than I would.

That’s it from me 🙂.

All the best,
Timothy