From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Rose Subject: Re: XHTML has no ... Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:52:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87ocz85l27.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> References: <87vdth2bgs.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <0AED3360-541A-4C7E-A502-374A27222C2A@uva.nl> <874p1077zd.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <16A8C8B7-3897-4C7E-AFC3-E7BBE8295FC4@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LDfje-00060v-Nf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:49:46 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LDfjb-0005zp-SZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:49:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45404 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LDfjb-0005zj-QU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:49:43 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:45475) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LDfjb-0002Vw-6l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:49:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <16A8C8B7-3897-4C7E-AFC3-E7BBE8295FC4@uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:48:21 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode Org-Mode Carsten Dominik writes: > On Dec 19, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > >> Hi Carsten, >> >> >>>> * XHTML has no... >>>> >>>> - ... attribut `name' in `... >>>> >>>> Should be: >>>> >>>> ... >>> >>> If I look at http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_a.asp >>> it seems that the a tag has a name, but no id......???? >> >> The id mentioned below under the headline `Standard Attributes'. >> >> But, yes, you're right. The `name' attribute is deprecated but still >> completely legal, as the DTD used for publishing >> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd) reveals: > > Well, I *can* take it out if it is better like this. I guess you are saying I > should... In fairly modern browsers it works with just the ID set. But as it is still legal to keep the `name' attribute there is no reason to remove it now. Once we switch to XHTML 2 we'll have to ... Not shure, how old a browser has to be to not support anchors without the `name' in it. > Fixed, thanks. Thank YOU, Cartsen ;-) All the Best, -- Sebastian Rose, EMMA STIL - mediendesign, Niemeyerstr.6, 30449 Hannover Tel.: +49 (0)511 - 36 58 472 Fax: +49 (0)1805 - 233633 - 11044 mobil: +49 (0)173 - 83 93 417 Http: www.emma-stil.de