From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Refresh of http://orgmode.org
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:35:33 +0100
Message-ID: <87obvcnu2i.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87k461we9q.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAJcAo8si+RNU3sevX0UQLpXuNutXGXBbiCv-PyrT9P=eAqkocQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<8739comi47.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44009)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1RaY7X-0001IN-C7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:34:36 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1RaY7W-0001t4-0y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:34:35 -0500
Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:45807)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1RaY7V-0001sx-RS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:34:33 -0500
Received: by eekc41 with SMTP id c41so16598eek.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:34:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8739comi47.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Tue, 13
	Dec 2011 18:39:04 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Eric,

Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:

> The only thing I don't particularly care for is the twitter box.  If I
> have the browser visible visiting this page, as I do right now, and
> especially on a separate monitor, I keep getting distracted by motion in
> my peripheral vision!  It's almost worse because of the faint display of
> the box when not hovering over it.  Minor point, mind you;  I just don't
> like animations on web sites...  others will of course disagree!

If people want to get rid of this box in the index* pages, no objection.

But.. wait.. why do you keep the index.html page open then?  I don't
make oops-here-is-another-stupid-bugfix-releases *that* often :)

> Samuel, I'm not sure what you mean here.  I'm using iceweasel 8.0 so am
> not sure what version of Firefox this is but if I increase the font size
> (via C-=) to the maximum size available, things still work mostly
> fine.  

I guess it depends on the screen resolution.  I have a fairly small
screen (on a fairly old computer) and I see what Samuel means...

Best,

-- 
 Bastien