From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: commit 7719734dd7 org-compat.el: New compatibility function `org-random' Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:30:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87oblch0p2.fsf@altern.org> References: <87k3w7dtt2.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bohj3vx0.fsf@altern.org> <87zk4wa16d.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBVE3-0004lx-LG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:30:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBVE2-0004zx-G2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:30:19 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:37731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBVE2-0004vw-9H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:30:18 -0400 Received: by weys10 with SMTP id s10so547490wey.0 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:30:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zk4wa16d.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:01:46 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > Bastien writes: >> Do you mean this should be (random) instead of (random t) in those >> versions? Why? If so, we can simply get rid of the compatibility >> macro and use (random). > > Do you mind if I revert that commit and implement the change? Absolutely not, on the contrary. Thanks in advance, PS: I've been busy today with some Emacs issues I thought would take less time. And I've been busy with the website last week, it always take more time than it seems... and maybe deserves. But I'm back focusing on Org. -- Bastien