From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Including setupfile settings during subtree export (new exporter) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:27:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87obebwj3s.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55619) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ3s8-0007Tm-Iq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:27:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ3s7-0005qz-8d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:27:12 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]:48984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ3s7-0005qr-28 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:27:11 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hi8so2894394wib.0 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:27:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (John Hendy's message of "Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:19:33 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Hendy Cc: emacs-orgmode Hello, John Hendy writes: > In the past, exporting a subtree seemed to pull options from my > #+setupfile line. And it should still do. > I've updated the line to the proper new syntax (#+include: > "/path/to/setupfile.org"), but subtree export doesn't seem to be using > the options set there (using =C-c C-e C-s l p= for LaTeX/PDF export). > > I tried using =#+include: "file"= as well as =#+setupfile: file= > inside the subtree properties drawer without success. Inside the property drawer? A property drawer can only contain node properties, e.g.: :PROP: value > If I mark the same subtree with :export: tag (no other trees are > marked), it works properly and uses my setupfile options. > > Any suggestions? If this was an oversight, my vote would be that a > buffer-set setupfile would apply to subtree exports unless overridden > by a property-drawer setting (even though I don't currently know that > the property draw setting is for a setupfile). I think I need an ECM to understand the problem you're describing. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou