From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan L Tyree Subject: Re: Index of cases Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 05:33:06 +1000 Message-ID: <87ob81yeml.fsf@breezy.my.home> References: <522BB194.7060705@gmail.com> <874n9wdj32.fsf@gmail.com> <522C16AD.9030102@gmail.com> <87a9jnzt5h.fsf@gmail.com> <8761ubzs8d.fsf@gmail.com> <874n9vq7q2.fsf@gmail.com> <522D0065.50306@gmail.com> <87y576pjkq.fsf@gmail.com> <522D7549.1000402@gmail.com> <20130909081007.GK20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33365) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJ7C1-0003GS-VO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:32:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJ7Bx-0002Lg-1I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:32:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]:39189) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJ7Bw-0002LQ-QI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:32:08 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mc17so6510000pbc.18 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 12:32:07 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <20130909081007.GK20690@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Suvayu Ali Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Suvayu Ali writes: > Hi Alan, > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:14:17PM +1000, Alan L Tyree wrote: >> >> My real problem is that I don't know how to generate the multiple indexes >> that I need if I use org mode. Everything else is easy. Any potential >> solution that I see involves adding lots more markup, but if I do that I >> might as well stick with LaTeX. > > This is indeed a subtle problem. I am having a hard time thinking of an > Org way of doing this without special markup. It would have to be > auto-generated in someway. So I have a somewhat non-technical > suggestion. How about you give the LaTeX macros you use human readable > aliases. The editors then might find it easier to edit LaTeX source > directly. Not a bad idea - that coupled with a LaTeX aware editor should help the human editor get past the unfamiliarity. Thanks! > > Hope this helps, -- Alan L Tyree http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan Tel: 04 2748 6206 sip:172385@iptel.org